James A. Beane makes a comparison of
old and new approaches to the idea of curriculum integration. The old view
has the subjects still separated from one another. The material is still
taught in a way that may relate to one another in some small way. However,
the students "still begin and end with subject-based content and skills."
In the new approach to integrated curriculum the students "move from one
activity or project to another , each one involving knowledge from multiple
sources (Beane,1997)."
A popular approach to understanding the concept
of integrated curriculum has been presented by Susan
Kovalik, founder of ITI (Integrated Thematic Instruction ).Kovalik
believes that teaching educators about the biology behind learning will
create dynamic new initiatives that will eventually benefit the student
in more ways than just helping them understand the standard -based concepts.
“Their product-producing and problem-solving capacities will be greatly
enhanced by this model (Kovalik,1998)”. In conclusion, the idea of integrating
key concepts can and should incorporate many disciplines together with
the opportunity for social interaction to practice problem-solving strategies
in a non-threatening environment.
Return
to Intropage