ART PERFORMANCE Name of Judge:_________________
|
Name of Presenter: |
|
|
Presentation Title: |
|
|
Time and Room: |
|
Please
rate the below areas based on the given scale:
N/A = not applicable
0 = miserably
done
1 = insufficient at best
2 = a little less than it should be
3 = just as expected from a grad student
4 = good work, definitely presentable
5 = outstanding or excellent work
|
CONTENT |
|
|
Clarity and Style |
|
|
|
Is there a strong connection between their thesis and the music performed? |
|
|
Is the connection clear? |
|
|
Were you able to understand the program based on the explanation and performance? |
|
|
Does the performance piece have a strong, individual voice? |
|
|
Does the performer trigger an emotional response? |
|
Effect of Performance |
|
|
|
Does the combination of the thesis and performance enhance the meaning and tone of the piece? |
|
Artistry and Interpretation |
|
|
|
Is the performance clear and understandable? Does the presenter perform at an appropriate rate of speed? |
|
|
Does the performer show an understanding of an appreciation for the piece he/she performed? |
|
Technique |
|
|
|
Is the presenter professional and scholarly? Does the presenter refrain from distracting mannerisms? |
|
|
TOTAL SCORE (45 maximum) |
Additional Comments