EXHIBIT Name of Judge:_______________________
|
Exhibit Number: |
|
|
Name of Researcher(s): |
|
|
Exhibit Title: |
|
Please
rate the below areas based on the given scale:
N/A = not applicable
0 = miserably
done
1 = insufficient at best
2 = a little less than it should be
3 = just as expected from a grad student
4 = good work, definitely presentable
5 = outstanding or excellent work
|
CONTENT |
|
|
Organization &. Clarity |
|
|
|
Is the exhibit clear and understandable? Are components clearly labeled? |
|
|
Is the exhibit self-explanatory? |
|
|
Is the exhibit professional and scholarly? |
|
|
Does the exhibit exemplify the researcher’s attention to detail and creativity? |
|
|
Is the exhibit logical in its presentation? Is there a clear pattern of organization? Is the material presented in an order that makes sense? |
|
|
Does the exhibitor make good use of the space provided? |
|
|
Is the exhibit attractive? Is it pleasing to the eye? |
|
Question or Thesis: |
|
|
|
Does the exhibit present a central idea? Good exhibits have central themes. |
|
|
Is the exhibit engaging? Does it tell a good story? |
|
|
Does the researcher make clear the significance of the exhibit? |
|
Methodology |
|
|
|
Is the story fair and balanced? That is, does the exhibit contain a wide range of views on the central issue? |
|
|
Does the exhibitor use a wide variety of presentation modes and media? |
|
Research &. Conclusions |
|
|
|
Is the exhibit informative? Does it tell a story? Exhibits should be educational experiences. |
|
|
Does the exhibit reach a wide audience? |
|
|
TOTAL SCORE (65 maximum) |
Additional Comments – please use back of form

