SUMMARY of TD13: Spectacle, Carnival & Festival. I see three inter-related systems: Festival, Carnival, and Spectacle. |
Similarities to other TD
methods:
Dissimilar to other TD Methods: |
NAVIGATION ON THIS PAGE |
Festival is what we get if we are able to disengage from lives of over-consumption and violent production. Carnival is when power gives its to nod to parody and satire of the power holders and celebrities of spectacle. it is that bit of theatrics when the workers dress up like the boss for the day and act out in ways to get the attention of power the their exploited condition. Spectacle is what is accumulated all around us in acts of production and consumption. Disney and Las Vegas are just the obvious examples. The Spectacle approach is based in Guy Debord's work and that of Steve Best and Douglas Kellner.
It is time to realize that Spectacles, the least important of Aristotle's (350 BCE) day, is now the most important theatrical element of late modern capitalism (Boje, 2002c). I view spectacles and carnival in dialectic relatioin, and here and there (but not always), a festive third alternative emerges.
For more on this see the FESTIVALISM study guides.
SPECTACLE - Spectacle goes back to Roman gladiators, the appropriation of entertainment, art, and festival for political and control purposes. By spectacle I mean Debord’s (1967) the Society of the Spectacle, a theatrics that is often violent and oppressive social control that masquerades as a celebration of progress by recycling pseudo-reforms, false-desires, and selective sightings of progressive evolution, never devolution. Spectacles are defined as – 'intertextual.' Various types of spectacle are intertextual' to other spectacles (the types are explained below); spectacles are embedded in socio-economic contexts by decontextualizing and recontextualizing.
FESTIVAL - By festival I mean Victor Turner's theatrics that is more related to in-the-moment enjoyment of a thing for its own sake. In ancient times, festival transgressed the boundary of nature and culture. See Festivalism web site.
CARNIVAL - By carnival I mean Bakhtin's theory of the theatrics of rant and madness seeking repair to separation and alienation, a call for help from corporate power, a cry of distress and repression mixed with laughter and humorous exhibition meant to jolt power into awareness of its psychic organization. Carnivalesque examples (McDonalds) (Carnival web site).More on Spectacles definitions SEE http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/septet/spectacles.htm
For Debord (1967) spectacle is the basis of late capitalism. The four types of spectacle include concentrated, diffuse, integrated and mega (Best & Kellner, 1997, 2001). ). Best and Kellner (1997) develop Debord’s spectacle types and in 2001 propose the “megaspectacle,” our national fetish to use the media to turn war or scandal into mass entertainment (e.g. the Gulf War and War on Terrorism are popular culture events, as were Watergate, the OJ Simpson trial, and the funeral of Princess Diana).
In sum, I assume that contemporary organizations produce, distribute, and consume spectacle Metatheatrics.
What follows is excerpts from my book Theatres of Capitalism (Boje, 2002c), an all conference paper on Enron presented in London in July (Boje, 2002a), an Academy of Management conference paper presented in August (Boje, 2002b), and a paper my colleagues and I have under review (Boje, Rosile, Durand, & Luhman, 2002). Please read and reference the original papers (See below).
Concentrated Spectacles - the theatrical performances of the firm; how the spectacle is produced.
Diffuse Spectacles - the theatrical performances of spectacle in the market. Spectacles diffuse through franchising and advertising, and dissemination throughout the globe.
Integrated Spectacles - these integrate the first two (concentrated plus diffuse). Its like McDonalds that has a spectacle stage in each franchise site, has diffused to thousands of sites (and stages), and tries to integrate the two. Now all three phases of intertextual are manifest: spectacles are produced, distributed, and consumed by the masses.
Mega Spectacles - from time time to time the integration disintegrates into scandal (megaspectacle). And these become mass entertainment. You know the examples (Watergate, OJ Simpson, Rodney King, Clinton and Monica, Princess Diana's funeral, & Enrongate).
I have two books, one being published and one searching for a home.
Boje, D. M. (2002c) Theatres of Capitalism. Book being published by Hampton Press (San Francisco). Available until publication, on line, at http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/theatrics/index.htm (password is required).
Boje, D. M. (2002d) Spectacles, Carnivals & Festivals of Capitalism. S&F - Use aggie359 (ID) and adventure (pass word).
Related Sites
Carnival - Carnival is the theatrics of parody and satire sanctioned by power. It can even be organized by power as a way for citizens to let off steam. In a more enlightened era carnival was a way for power to see how it felt to be under foot. I did some re-reading of Kristeva (1980: 65) and found it was on Bakhtin's dialogic of text and context and particularly his concepts of the polyphonic and carnivalesque novels that Kristeva demarcated intertextual from structural or comparative analyses. Kristeva (1980: 78) says carnival is the double, "it is a spectacle, but without a stage; a game, but also a daily undertaking; a signifier, but also a signified." The context of the carnival is the crowd, the stage, the actors, and the game itself. Intertextuality analysis has moved carnival aside. For example, I note that Fairclough's (1992) approach to intertextuality analysis does not include carnivalesque, but instead gives it a different (and still useful) twist. For Fairclough the bottom line is a hegemonic analysis of intertextuality. With this move he resituates intertextuality analysis into the philosophy of critical theory, into the vertical axis of not only context but power.
- Examples of Carnival
- How about this one - a parody of Nobel Prize Ceremony and Awards (press here)
Spectacle
is above all a legitimating narrative for social engineering and
social control masking the violent (non-Ahimsa) acts of production
and consumption. By spectacle I mean Debord’s (1967) the Society
of the Spectacle, the often violent and oppressive social control
that masquerades as a celebration of betterment by recycling
pseudo-reforms, false-desires, and selective sightings of
progressive evolution, never devolution. By violent I mean the
willful and careless and often unnecessary disruption or
extinction of the life of another, including the life of non-human
species.
Consider the similarities. Both spectacle and festival combine theatrics, storytelling, crafts, and other arts into a community of performance. Both festival and spectacle incorporate food, story, theatrics, music, art, and other entertainment. I want to open up the question of what is festival for more rigorous exploration. They are oftentimes found together, occupying the same time and place. The same work organization has both festive and spectacle garniture.
People do resist spectacle - there is hope for spectacle transformation. There are eco-teams forming in Europe and North America to look at ways to cut back on our over-consumption patterns. Consumer groups are forming that resist shopping addictions, credit card addition, workaholism, and television/Nintendo/Web cyber dependency. Turning Point for example runs full-page ads to raise questions about the impact of technology and transnational corporate strategies on the environment and the ability of nations to sustain growing populations with a quality of life for their people. It is in this context that I am proposing transorganizational theory and praxis rooted in festivalism and efforts to contain the spread of spectacle.
Simplicity, for example, is a movement to cut out unneeded consumption and production in the hopes that others on the planet will have the means to live. Look at Simplicity and Affluenza movements as background before moving on:
SIMPLICITY
DECONSTRUCTING LAS VEGAS SPECTACLE
CONFERENCE
1998b Wile Coyote Meets the Road Runner Paper presentation to the Sun Break Conference, Chaos and Complexity, chaired by Janice Bl ack, Las Cruces, NM, February at New Mexico State University.
1998c What Postmodern Philosophers Have to Contribute to Knowledge Researchers Paper presented to INFORMS (Institute for Ope rations Research and Management Sciences) conference, Seattle, WA, October (click on David’s presentation)
1998d A Wicked Introduction to the Unbroken Circle Conference: International Business & Ecology. P. v-xiii. In Internationa l Business and Ecology Research Yearbook.
1998e How Critical Theory and Critical Pedagogy can Unmask Nike's Labor Practices presented to the Critical Theory pre-conference of the Academy of Management meetings, San Diego, CA, August 8.
1998f Nike, Greek Goddess of Victory or Cruelty? Women's Stories of Asian Factory Life Published (October) in Journal of Organizational Change Management. Vol 11(6):461-480.
1998g. The Swoosh Goddess is a Vampire: Nike's Environmental Accounting Storytelling. Pp. 23-32. In International Business and Ecology Research Yearbook. IABD Publication.
1999 New Is Nike Roadrunner or Wile E. Coyote? A Postmodern Organization Analysis of Double Logic, published in Journal of Busi ness & Entrepreneurship. Special Issue (March, Vol II) 77-109.. This is an analysis of the relationship between Nike activists and Nike. This is a pre-publication draft.
Aristotle
(written 350 BCE). E.g. (1954) translation Aristotle: Rhetoric and
Poetics. Intro by Friedrich Solmsen; Rhetoric translated by W. Rhys
Roberts; Poetics translated by Ingram Bywater. NY: The Modern Library
(Random House). Poetics was written 350 BCE. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/poetics.html
Best, Steven & Douglas Kellner (2001). Postmodern Adventure. NY/London: The Guilford Press.
Boje,
D. M. (2001a). Narrative
Methods for Organizational and Communication Research. London Sage.
Boje,
D. M. (2001b). Carnivalesque Resistance to Global Spectacle: A Critical
Postmodern Theory of Public Administration. Administrative Theory &
Praxis. Vol. 23 (3): 431-458.
Boje, D. M. (2001c). Global Theatrics and Capitalism. Presentation to Academy of Management Conference, Washington D.C., August.
Boje,
D. M. (2002a). Critical Dramaturgical Analysis of Enron Antenarratives and
Metatheatre. Plenary presentation to 5th International Conference on
Organizational Discourse: From Micro-Utterances to Macro-Inferences,
Wednesday 24th - Friday 26th July (London).
http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/papers/ENRON_critical_dramaturgical_analysis.htm
Boje, D. M. (2002b)
Enron Metatheatre: A Critical Dramaturgy Analysis of Enron’s
Quasi-Objects. Paper presented at the Networks, Quasi-Objects, and
Identity: Reintegrating Humans, Technology, and Nature session of Denver
Academy of Management Meetings. Tuesday August 13, 2002.
http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/papers/enron_theatre_LJM.htm
Boje, D. M. (2002c) Theatres of Capitalism. Book being published by Hampton Press (San Francisco). Available until publication, on line, at http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/theatrics/index.htm (password is required).
Boje, D.M., Ann L. Cunliffe & John T. Luhman (2002). A dialectic perspective on the organizational theatre metaphor. Paper under review.
Boje, D. M. & G. A. Rosile (2002a). The Metatheatre Intervention Manual. To be published by ISEOR Research Institute of University of Lyon 2, France.
Boje,
D. M. & G. A. Rosile (2002b). Theatrics of SEAM. Paper to be published
in Journal of Organizational Change Management Special Issue on
Socio-Economic Approach to Management (SEAM), guest edited by Henri Saval.
Boje,
D. M., Grace Ann Rosile, Rita A. Durant & John T. Luhman (2002). Enron
spectacle theatrics: A critical dramaturgical analysis. Under review at
Organization Studies, for special issue on organization theatre.
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Debord Guy (1967). Society of the Spectacle. La Société du Spectacle was first published in 1967 by Editions, Buchet-Chastel (Paris); it was reprinted in 1971 by Champ Libre (Paris). The full text is available in English at http://www.nothingness.org/SI/debord/index.html It is customary to refer to paragraph numbers in citing this work.
See Festivalism